Stop sending me e-mail!!!!!

Adam Kneisley




---Joyce Luy <jluy@westmont.edu> wrote:
>
> Re: The publication of costs for the next year...I have found that
most of
> the "Big 4" will either send a card for update or call....this is
very helpful.
>
> And, I wanted to than kthose of you responding to my interest in
downloading
> the CDS...Mission accomplished and it makes the job of completing
this form
> so much easier...Thanks!
>
> Joyce Luy
>
> At 12:02 AM 10/22/98, you wrote:
> >Common Data Set Digest for Thursday, October 22, 1998.
> >
> >1. question...
> >2. RE: [cds] question...
> >3. [cds] question about costs... -Reply
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >X-Message-Number: 1
> >X-Lyris-Id: 5063
> >Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:38:04 -0400
> >From: Jennifer Cafiero <JCafiero@fsmail.pace.edu>
> >Subject: question...
> >
> >
> >--------------CEDE37668FFA6EE2E1F97F0F
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >Good morning all!
> >
> >I have one quick questions regarding the CDS Section G Question 1
> >(tuition, fees, room and board).
> >
> >The question asks for tuition, fees, and residence prices for the
> >1999-2000 academic year. Pace University has not set the tuition for
> >next year yet and will not for some time. Should I use the 1998-1999
> >rates? I noticed that the previous person in my position used the
> >1997-1998 rates on last year's survey. Please advise.
> >
> >Thank you.
> >Jennifer
> >
> >--------------CEDE37668FFA6EE2E1F97F0F
> >Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> ><HTML>
> >Good morning all!
> >
> ><P>I have one quick questions regarding the CDS Section G Question
1 (tuition,
> >fees, room and board).
> >
> ><P>The question asks for tuition, fees, and residence prices for the
> <B>1999-2000</B>
> >academic year.  Pace University has not set the tuition for next year
> >yet and will not for some time.  Should I use the 1998-1999 rates? 
> >I noticed that the previous person in my position used the
1997-1998 rates
> >on last year's survey.  Please advise.
> >
> ><P>Thank you.
> ><BR>Jennifer</HTML>
> >
> >--------------CEDE37668FFA6EE2E1F97F0F--
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >X-Message-Number: 2
> >X-Lyris-Id: 5064
> >Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:43:32 -0400
> >From: "Gernand, Renee" <RGernand@collegeboard.org>
> >Subject: RE: [cds] question...
> >
> >Yes, just send it back with the 1998-99 tuition and fees: each =
> >publisher
> >will undoubtedly call you in the spring or summer to obtain your =
> >1999-2000
> >tuition and fees.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jennifer Cafiero [mailto:JCafiero@fsmail.pace.edu]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 1998 7:44 AM
> >To: Common Data Set
> >Subject: [cds] question...
> >
> >
> >Good morning all!=20
> >
> >I have one quick questions regarding the CDS Section G Question 1 =
> >(tuition,
> >fees, room and board).=20
> >
> >
> >The question asks for tuition, fees, and residence prices for the =
> >1999-2000
> >academic year.=A0 Pace University has not set the tuition for next
year =
> >yet
> >and will not for some time.=A0 Should I use the 1998-1999 rates?=A0
I =
> >noticed
> >that the previous person in my position used the 1997-1998 rates on =
> >last
> >year's survey.=A0 Please advise.=20
> >
> >
> >Thank you.=20
> >Jennifer=20
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >X-Message-Number: 3
> >X-Lyris-Id: 5065
> >Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 11:04:04 -0500
> >From: David Davis-Van Atta <DDavisVa@acs.carleton.edu>
> >Subject: [cds] question about costs... -Reply
> >
> >We went over this last year at this time.
> >
> >It's a problem, in two respects.
> >
> >1. MANY institutions have not set tuition for the next year by the
> >time the CDS is to be filled out. Yes, of course it would be good to
> >give college-bound families the figures for 99-2000 at this time, for
> >the guides that will be published and used next year at this time.
> >However, it is simply NOT POSSIBLE at this point in time for many, if
> >not most, institutions.
> >
> >2. Publishing next year's tuition levels before they have been
> >formally approved by Boards (or Regents/the state) and publicly
> >announced would be a direct violation of the terms of the Justice
> >Department's anti-trust suit of the late 1980's. The reason behind
> >this is that before formal approval sets the figures in stone, they
> >could still be changed (presumably if the increases of other
> >competitor institutions were significantly higher or lower). This is
> >tantamount to price fixing, at least in Justice's eyes.
> >
> >I DO wish the publishers would fix this wording. It is both
confusing
> >to those completing the surveys, and collects disparate data. Those
> >institutions who can provide the 99-2000 figures probably will do so,
> >whereas those who cannot will provide those for 98-99. The
> >incomparability of the information is, I would say, not a good
thing.
> >Many families may not pick up that some of the data are for one year,
> >and some for another. Worse, some guides simply take whatever data
> >are available, and indiscriminately label them as being for a single
> >particular year, even though they are not.
> >
> >I would urge that we seriously consider fixing this one.
> >
> >
> >
> >David Davis-Van Atta
> >Director of Institutional Research
> >Carleton College
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >
> >END OF DIGEST
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ****************************************
> * Joyce Luy *
> * Associate Dean of Admissions *
> * Westmont College *
> * (805)565-6005 *
> * (805)565-6234 FAX *
> * 955 La Paz Rd Santa Barbara CA 93108 *
> ****************************************
>
>
>

==

Adam E. Kneisley
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com